ABC Loses Again in Quest to Prohibit PLAs on PA Prison Projects
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Jan. 18 dealt what may be the final blow to nonunion contractors seeking to bar the state from requiring project labor agreements on large prison construction projects (Hawbaker v. Pennsylvania, Pa., No. 111 MAP 2009, 1/18/11).
In a per curiam order, the state high court affirmed a December 2009 ruling in which the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court denied a preliminary injunction motion by five Pennsylvania chapters of the Associated Builders and Contractors and dozens of open-shop contractors and nonunion workers in their lawsuit against the Pennsylvania Department of General Services (DGS).
At issue in the lawsuit is a DGS requirement that the successful prime contractor and all subcontractors on certain large prison construction projects execute a project labor agreement (PLA).
The lower court rejected the plaintiffs' arguments that a PLA requirement discriminates against nonunion contractors and workers by putting them at a competitive disadvantage and violates the National Labor Relations Act by requiring employers to recognize unions and workers to join unions.
The PLA mandate ultimately was dropped from two of the four major prison construction projects for which the state began seeking proposals in 2009.
PLAs Required in Two Prison Projects
PLAs are required in the other two projects, for construction of a 4,032-bed facility to replace the State Correctional Institute at Graterford in Montgomery County and a 2,000-bed facility in Fayette County, according to attorney Dana B. Klinges of Duane Morris LLP in Philadelphia, who represents the state.
DGS documents show the winning proposals for those projects came in at $179 million for the German Township facility in Fayette County and $323 million for Graterford, although final contracts have not been awarded yet.
Klinges said the state supreme court decision is “very significant” in that it confirms DGS's authority to use a PLA when it believes such an agreement is in the best interest of the state.
The Commonwealth Court ruling that was affirmed by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court was on a preliminary injunction motion, Klinges said, “so technically we have to continue on the merits” of the case in the lower court.
But she predicted that the plaintiffs will not pursue the issue further, in light of the rulings that have been handed down so far.
Show All News Headlines
Thank you for visiting the web page of the Pennsylvania State
Building & Construction Trades Council. The unionized construction
industry is very unique, and we are proud to be the organization that
leads the way when it comes to standing up for what is best for our
members...and what is best for our communities.
Throughout our extremely large and diverse state, it is the members of
the Pennsylvania Building Trades that create and maintain the
infrastructure in the Commercial and Industrial Industries, which
includes office buildings, hospitals, universities, schools, libraries,
stadiums, bridges and highways, warehouses, power generation facilities, refineries
and chemical plants that make our state such a wonderful place to live
and do business. It is these same members of the Building Trades that
tirelessly give back to their communities by volunteering their time to
organizations that make life better for those less fortunate. We go
beyond the call of duty to raise the standard of living for people in
The work of the unionized construction trades speaks for itself. Our
apprenticeship training programs are second to none, and no one can
compete with the level of skilled craftsmanship that our journeymen and
bring to the job site.
Please take the time to browse our web site. Here you will be able to
link to our affiliated local unions, contractors and government
contacts. You will also be able to get information on Prevailing Wages,
Helmets to Hard Hats, Safety and Health training, Legislative, Political
Actions, and upcoming events being hosted by the State Council and
Thanks for visiting!